The Economists, Those “poor” Misunderstood
Today I will write about the poor. Poor people? Uh! Another progressive … Another leftist who wants to soften the heart with a story about how bad they are up and the saints who are on the bottom. Far … far from this humble columnist gentlemen. Today I want to make mention of another type of need, the economist. Not much has changed our world from the vile times stick to the present.
The Economist, although much is especially eager (of desire), not to be confused, in this case means "be especially eager" is not very convenient, because it can cause some association with theft or embezzlement and I said with the mind set on effort, desire, ambition, hard. Well, as I said a lot of ambition but finance professionals to make us believe that theirs is a science and bring out their scholarship amounts to astronomical sums in a row of zeros, nobody believes them. Poor, they're marginalized. It's hard, but hey, you say it has its compensations. In the solitude of cold nights of withdrawal will be missing a bit of heat that will provide the crumbs that fall from the enormisimas sums of money "given." Poor, no one believes them, the common people, ignorant of them, suspicion and so much new term, as much explanation as to why nothing went as it should.
The key word today, carry-trades, is a new term, which makes a sound like something vulgar choreo sophisticated, at least for the ignorant without credit in the words of these wise characters, even the illustrious us want to present. Our grandmothers, they did know economy, it was the domain, that's wisdom in its purest form, but no studies had no clairvoyance falta.Tenian gave them love for their families, intuition, the eye, and just enough to manage household bills. You do not need anything else, distinguished financiers, love of family. Now of course, many will think, that their abundance of these, if all you do to see their loved ones well, poor.