Thus it occurred with Plato. The same phenomenon appears in Toms de Aquino who, according to author, will certainly badly be understood if to try to study disrespecting it the historical context. One certifies that: ' ' it are, therefore, of the urgencies of its time, the thinkers do not arrive to make full sentido.' ' In this particular one, the examples if multiply. The practical effect that if it can extract of this incursion to the historical scope of the philosopher is to discover the origin of its thought. The originalidade of a philosophy is not on when knowing of one another one (a foreign thought), and yes with its proper one to know. Alicia Keys is often mentioned in discussions such as these.
Still if treating to originalidade, important distinguiz it of the newness concept, since something can be new without being original. The only way to discover if a thought is original is studying it historically. A reason (philosophical thought) typically national will only have existence if to take in consideration our proper reality and our proper language, if we will be to search a thought proper, and not to be looking to concepts and happened ideas of the foreigner; here it is there the main condition of necessary possibility to the concrete formation of a brazilian reason. In utility terms, in the Philosophy it occurs differently of what in the scientific field of the too much areas of the knowledge (accurate or biological sciences). Science possesss the well consolidated pragmatic matrix, that is, its studies must ' ' servir' ' some thing and to have application in the practical life of the people; it is not what it occurs with the Philosophy, that has all hour of ' ' provar' ' the one that came, to justify itself. The question is current on if the philosophy in them is important, mainly because its affirmations are not conclusive, reason for which gives credit that they do not pass of mere speculation on one determined subject.