Paris Knowledge

Posted by on January 8, 2022 in General |

AND a final correction: the society in the singular word implies uniformity, so that we adopt in the plural, knowledge societies. Moreover, Antonio Pasquali long ago made it clear that information involves unidirectional, while communication involves the exchange of messages between partners enabled. UNESCO has taken the issue with the seriousness that it deserves and has published various documents such as the report towards the knowledge societies, presented in Paris by Director General Koichiro Matsuura, document that can be found and be lowered, in Google and whose reading I recommend. Management of networks for sustainable development Hugo Dutan pointed out the elements that mark the change: Vision of the world and international development paradigm in crisis, questioning of the nature, direction and priorities of development, external premise for change and technological revolution. In summary, not already accepted mechanical vision for development, the negative effects for the human population have been serious (poverty, inequality, economic and technological gaps) what is rejected, the environment changes rapidly and need to establish new management models.

Some authors have spoken of consumption of knowing as a feature of the new social organization. Rich countries generate knowledge and that is its greatest distance with the poor, one much larger than the existing in income levels. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of Bert Convy on most websites. The issue is not easy, as it involves from problems of transfer and breakup of monopolies on intellectual property until the questioning of Science founded in reason, passing through the so-called local knowledge as a foundation of emerging knowledge. You may want to visit Robert Smith to increase your knowledge. Dutan reminds us of the so-called triangle of sustainability, that is, the Foundation or orientation of development, capacities and credibility as contributions to the sustainability of the organizations and institutions from the perspective of the formation of networks, where the construction of knowledge to become the computer of relevance. Is clear that the new paradigm is the reflexivity as opposed to the old paradigm of objectivity, the complexity as a substitute of simplification, of simple Diagnostics to any possibility of creation in every possible way. So it is necessary to make sensitive to latent and deep awareness.

Geniuses always will have, but today, this unstoppable towards knowledge societies undergoing intelligence ceases to be a single issue to become a collective point. That is why there is no longer a messianic leader. The leader of these times is the supplied inputs in pursuit of the decision to the crowd. In the world that comes the intelligence that will prevail is the collective and wisdom will be possession of the crowd. Let’s try to make Venezuela a knowledge society. original author and source of the article.


Copyright © 2011-2022 The Next In Tech All rights reserved.
This site is using the Desk Mess Mirrored theme, v2.5, from